Examples of using A contrary intention in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
reservation considered as being maintained should be recognized. That is the meaning of the phrase," unless the successor State expresses a contrary intention", with which this guideline ends.
replace the words" unless a contrary intention of the said State or organization can be identified" by the expression" unless the said State or organization expresses a contrary intention".
international organization and the reserving State or organization, unless a contrary intention has been definitely expressed by the objecting State or organization[in accordance with guideline 2.6.8].
Subject to the provisions of guideline 5.11, a successor State shall be considered as maintaining any objection formulated by the predecessor State to a reservation formulated by a contracting State or contracting international organization or by a State party or international organization party to a treaty unless it expresses a contrary intention at the time of the succession.
In order to overcome those problems, he suggested that the second paragraph should be deleted and that the words" unless a contrary intention of the said State or organization can be identified", in the first paragraph, should be replaced by the phrase" unless the said State or organization expresses a contrary intention".
In accordance with that position, paragraph 4(b) of draft article 19, adopted on second reading in 1965, merely provided that" an objection by another contracting State to a reservation precludes the entry into force of the treaty as between the objecting and reserving States unless a contrary intention is expressed by the objecting State".
Particularly noteworthy was the shift from the positive presumption that an author of an invalid reservation became a party to the treaty without the benefit of the reservation, unless a contrary intention of the said State could be identified, to a neutral stance whereby the intention of the reserving State determined whether it became a party to a treaty.
She would like to draw particular attention to article 20, paragraph 4(b), of the Vienna Convention, which aimed at consensus by providing that an objection by another contracting State to a reservation did not preclude the entry into force of the treaty between it and the reserving State unless a contrary intention was definitely expressed by the objecting State.
This led some States to suggest a compromise solution, giving greater weight to the role of the intention; thus, Austria and the United Kingdom proposed to retain the positive presumption of former draft guideline 4.5.2 but to allow authors of reservations to have the last word, by granting them the possibility of expressing a contrary intention.
(39) The expression" unless a contrary intention of the said State or organization can be identified", which appears at the end of the first paragraph of guideline 4.5.2, reflects this positive presumption retained by the Commission subject to the intention of the reserving State or reserving international organization.
Some delegations expressed support for draft guideline 4.5.2, stating, in its paragraph 1, the presumption of severability of an invalid reservation, according to which the reserving State or international organization was considered to be bound by the treaty without the benefit of the invalid reservation unless a contrary intention of that State or organization could be identified.
On an initial legal review, it does not appear that there is a contrary intention in equating two full years to the preceding 24 months instead of two full calendar years. Prima facie, a" full year" means 12 full months and a" calendar year" means the period from 1 January to 31 December.
then it should be presumed that once the armed conflict ceased the resumption of the treaty should be automatic unless there was a contrary intention.
an objection by another contracting State to a reservation precludes the entry into">force of the treaty as between the objecting and reserving States unless a contrary intention is expressed by the objecting State".
It likewise approved of draft guideline 4.5.2, to the effect that unless a contrary intention had been manifested by the State or international organization that had formulated an invalid reservation, the treaty would be applicable to it without the benefit of the reservation.
(b) an objection by a contracting State or by a contracting organization to a reservation does not preclude the entry into force of the treaty as between the objecting State or international organization and the reserving State or organization unless a contrary intention is definitely expressed by the objecting State or organization;
Draft guideline 5.16 bis established the principle that a newly independent State maintained the acceptances formulated by the predecessor State while recognizing that such a successor State had the capacity to express a contrary intention within a period of 12 months from the date of the succession of States.