Examples of using Communication should in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Committee notes the argument of the State party that the communication should be considered inadmissible on the grounds that it constitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications, since four years and six months passed between the ruling by the Superior Court and the submission of the communication to the Committee.
The State party also considers that the communication should be found inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol taking into account that the author only provides minimum information about the property confiscated in 1970,
The Committee notes the State party ' s arguments that the author has not exhausted domestic remedies and that the communication should be considered inadmissible as an abuse of the right of submission of a communication under article 3 of the Optional Protocol, in view of the delay in submitting the communication to the Committee.
The next issue is whether“standing” to submit a communication should be extended to“third parties”,
By failing to accept the competence of the Committee to determine whether a communication should be registered and by declaring outright that it will not accept the Committee ' s determination on the admissibility or the merits of the communication, the State party is violating its obligations under article 1 of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The next issue is whether“standing” to submit a communication should be extended to“third parties”, in other words individuals and groups who, although not themselves victims of a violation, have what is deemed“a sufficient interest” in the matter(to use the term employed in the CEDAW draft(see para. 6 above)).
However, in order to conclude that a right has been abused(despite the lack of any time limit) a considerable period of time must have elapsed, and the adequate length of time for submitting a communication should be assessed against the background of each individual case.
The Committee also takes note of the State party ' s argument that the communication should be declared inadmissible ratione loci
The Committee recalled that rule 96(b) of its rules of procedure provides that a communication should normally be submitted by the individual personally or by that individual ' s representative, but that a communication submitted on behalf of an alleged victim may, however, be accepted when it appears that the individual in question is unable to submit the communication personally.
In this respect, the Committee recalls that rule 96(b) of its rules of procedure provides that a communication should normally be submitted by the individual personally or by that individual ' s representative, but that a communication submitted on behalf of an alleged victim may, however, be accepted when it appears that the individual in question is unable to submit the communication personally.
In this respect, the Committee recalls that rule 96(b) of its rules of procedure provides that a communication should normally be submitted by the individual personally or by that individual ' s representative, but that a communication submitted on behalf of an alleged victim may, however, be accepted when it appears that the individual in question is unable to submit the communication personally.
not requested the Prosecutor ' s Office to have his administrative case examined under the supervisory review proceedings and thus, according to the State party, the communication should be declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies under article 5,
The Committee takes note of the submissions of the State party to the effect that the communication should be declared inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol
Two-way communication shouldn't be a problem.
He concludes that his communication should be declared admissible.
Communication should be restored in a few hours.
All radio communication should be done using call signs.
This part of the communication should be declared inadmissible.
A pragmatic approach to internal communication should be adopted.