Examples of using Extradition process in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Options such as a country allowing a suspect to“informally surrender” without an extradition process or the arrest of a suspect while in international waters83 are two alternatives to a formal extradition request.
those of the relevant Commonwealth Scheme which facilitates the extradition process.
his return was not voluntary but the result of an extradition process.
Two branches of Government are involved in the extradition process, the executive and the judiciary,
they want to start the extradition process.
the Home Secretary informed the parties on 11 January 2000 that he was considering the possibility of discontinuing the extradition process for medical reasons
alleged by the source, the country of nationality cannot intervene in the extradition process and is neither able nor required to consent to the extradition. .
since the latter date, the author has had no reason to complain about violations of his rights under the Covenant in the context of the extradition process.
The introduction of this new method of submitting evidence is a good example of the relaxation of the evidence requirements in common-law countries, where there are often stiff requirements regarding evidence which hinder the extradition process.
all charges against them in March, allowing the extradition process to commence.
Because of the fundamental nature of dual criminality in the extradition process, many experts expressed doubt that such a requirement could ever be abolished in extradition practice.
The average length of the extradition process was reported to be approximately 4-6 months depending on the complexity of the case
The Constitutional Affairs Committee inquired into the extradition process between Djibouti and the United States
The Government of Canada contends that the extradition process and its result in the case of Kindler satisfied Canada's obligation in respect of the Covenant on this point.
it should not be subject to the rigours or difficulties of the extradition process.
That is, States cannot use deportation procedures for the sole purpose of avoiding an extradition process where there is not otherwise a legitimate immigration purpose.
if the officers speak, may have led some influential groups to exert pressure in order to hinder the extradition process.
since it might help the Committee to understand how the extradition process worked in Tajikistan.
However, the evidence presented by Ng during the extradition process in Canada(which evidence has been submitted by counsel for Ng in this communication)
As the extradition process unfolded in Canada,