Examples of using Objectively comparable in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
with the result that those two categories of taxpayers are in an objectively comparable position.
the difference in treatment must concern situations not objectively comparable or be justified by an overriding reason in the public interest see judgment of 10 May 2012 in Santander Asset Management SGIIC
freedom to provide services, since those two categories of companies are not in an objectively comparable situation.
the difference in treatment must concern situations which are not objectively comparable or be justified by an overriding reason in the public interest see judgment in Santander Asset Management SGIIC
the difference in treatment must apply to situations which are not objectively comparable or be justified by overriding reasons in the public interest judgment of 13 March 2014 in Bouanich,
First, it must be ascertained whether the situations at issue are objectively comparable.
Accordingly, that situation is not objectively comparable to the situation in which the Kingdom of the Netherlands has concluded such a tax convention.
that that difference in treatment can be explained by the fact that those two situations are not objectively comparable.
It takes the view that the situation of a permanent establishment located in another Member State is not objectively comparable to that of an establishment located within German territory.
The Netherlands Government concludes that the difference in treatment at issue in the main proceedings relates to situations which are not objectively comparable and that therefore there is no discrimination.
a resident company and that of a company holding shares in a non-resident company are not objectively comparable.
all beers were chosen with a objectively comparable taste within the same beer type.
contrary to the Netherlands Government's contention, that difference in treatment cannot be justified on the ground that it concerns situations which are not objectively comparable.
in the main proceedings, the effect of Paragraph 5(2)(3) of the KStG is to treat foundations in objectively comparable situations differently by reason of their place of residence.
The Republic of Austria submits, first, that the institutions listed in Paragraph 4a(1)(a) to(d) of the amended EStG are not objectively comparable to the corresponding research
he reiterated that the principle of non-discrimination was founded on the equal treatment of persons in objectively comparable situations.
the making of gifts by Austrian private foundations to resident beneficiaries is a situation objectively comparable to that where the same foundations make gifts to beneficiaries residing in another Member State.
of the present judgment, that difference in treatment cannot be justified on the ground that it concerns situations which are not objectively comparable.
Norwegian companies is objectively comparable to that of Netherlands companies with regard to the risks of double taxation on the profits of Netherlands companies of which they hold part of the capital.
of the amended EStG are not objectively comparable with similar institutions established in other Member States, as only the