Examples of using Procuring entity's in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
decides to reject a tender" at the end of the second sentence in paragraph(4), so as to ensure that the procuring entity's concerns and reasons for those concerns would be recorded in writing;
two-stage tendering would normally involve a process to define the procuring entity's needs before the commencement of the procurement, perhaps involving consultant experts.
The record of procurement proceedings should, as a matter of best practice, include a justification of the procuring entity's decision(s)and recording such information is an example of the additional information that the enacting State may wish to include in the list of information required to be included in the documentary record of the procurement proceedings under article 25(1) w.
allow refinement to the statement of the procuring entity's needs at the second stage, it is important
technical description may improve suppliers' or contractors' understanding of the procuring entity's needs.
dialogue or negotiations-both to explain the procuring entity's needs in a way that can be fully
where there are many possible solutions to the procuring entity's needs and in which the personal skill and expertise of the supplier
contractors that challenge the procuring entity's assessment of their capability to meet the procuring entity's needs at a particular time, the procuring entity should interpret the term“then capable of meeting the needs” in a very narrow sense,
However, in the case of the challenge of the procuring entity's decision, the policy considerations regarding delaying the execution of a procurement contract to allow an effective challenge
The procurement regulations may usefully discuss the extent of the procuring entity's discretion to use trademark or trade name,
where the procuring entity issued two types of notice: the notice sent to those suppliers or contractors party to the framework agreement which were considered to be"capable" took the form of an e-mail addressed to them, while the notice intended for the other parties to the framework agreement was posted on the procuring entity's website.
Inclusion of this provision is important because a procuring entity may need to do so for reasons of public interest, such as where there appears to have been a lack of competition or to have been collusion in the procurement proceedings, where the procuring entity's need for the goods,
not the procuring entity, make proposals to meet the procuring entity's needs, they should not take a lead in defining those needs.
contractors effectively to challenge the procuring entity's decisions.
Upon conclusion of the dialogue, the suppliers and contractors make BAFOs to meet the procuring entity's needs.
subjective assessments of the ability of suppliers or contractors to meet the procuring entity's needs.
Ideally, no fees should be charged for access to, and use of, the procuring entity's communications systems.
The Model Law does not address the issue of charges for accessing and using the procuring entity's communications systems.
The Model Law does not address the issue of charges for accessing and using the procuring entity's information systems.
The provisions do not refer to the procuring entity's competence to consider challenges to decisions to cancel the procurement.