Examples of using Mexico asserts in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
Mexico asserts that instead of implementing a vehicle inspection program,
Mexico asserts that the submission does not meet several of the NAAEC Article 14 requirements,
Nevertheless, Mexico asserts that the terms and conditions of the Approval show that Mexico did take into account these standards
vigilant monitoring of water quality, Mexico asserts that the 2002-2006 Regional Water Program for Region VIII,
revealing structure.663 Thus, Mexico asserts that the United States incorrectly faults the Panel for analysing the"design" of the determination provisions alone, instead of also examining how the determination provisions are"applied.
did not obtain a prior environmental impact authorization.88 Mexico asserts that the EIA procedure did not exist in the environmental law applicable to Molymex when the company was established in 1979
Mexico asserts that this provision merely establishes a catalogue of activities permitted within protected natural areas
The United States and Mexico assert that they have consistently sought recommendations on the measures found to be inconsistent as of the date of Panel establishment.
Mexico asserted that another complaint filed by the Submitter, on 14 September 2000, was concluded with the imposition of a fine against Alca of 2,421 pesos.
As discussed above120, in its request for the establishment of an Article 21.5 panel, Mexico asserted that the US regime comprises the following three legal instruments:(i) the DPCIA121;(ii) the implementing regulations122; and(iii) the Hogarth ruling.123 6.8.
Finally, Canada and Mexico assert that Article 2.1 does not require complainants to show that the less favourable treatment accorded to imported products is expressly, or effectively, based on origin.
we note that Canada and Mexico asserted before the Panel that their third
Mexico asserts that the taxes levied on soju are higher than those levied on tequila.
In its Response, Mexico asserts that these instruments are not applicable to the matters raised by the Submission.
Mexico asserts that it did not do so because the company's activities are not compatible with SCNP 92, 133-140.
Mexico asserts that it has not failed to effectively enforce its environmental law because it has scheduled actions to handle these problems.
Mexico asserts in its response that environmental impact assessment was not required when Molymex commenced its operations
In its Response, Mexico asserts that INE issued an environmental impact authorization for the first phase of the project on 7 February 1995,
Mexico asserts that the standard set in NOM-022
However, Mexico asserts that the process was concluded pursuant to law without initiation of a criminal investigation.15 In addition,