Examples of using The current draft articles in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
That would also rule out the possibility that the potential convention on diplomatic protection would be deprived of some of the progressive elements that appear in the current draft articles but might not immediately gain the universal support of the international community, and the possibility that the potential convention would be ratified by only a small number of States, which might weaken the legal regime of diplomatic protection enshrined in it.
Furthermore, with regard to the commentary to draft article 1 and the potential questions to be raised therein concerning the relationship between the current draft articles and the 1997 Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses, his delegation held the view that that matter should receive careful consideration
In the view of the same representative, by including the word" normally" the Commission had made it clear that the burden of proof lay upon States which wanted to apply the current draft articles to regulate rivers not flowing into a common terminus on the ground that there existed a physical relationship and a unitary whole for the major part of the length of the watercourses.
it was suggested( and the Working Group agreed) that the current draft articles 2( 2) and 1 should be expanded and transformed into separate provisions which should, following the structure of the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, provide for the definition of conciliation, the scope of application of the model provisions, the commencement of conciliation proceedings, the number and selection of conciliators and the role of conciliators, including the principles that should guide the conduct of conciliation.
It was suggested that the current draft articles should be reviewed to determine whether they needed to be reorganized
Like groundwater, oil and gas were scarce resources of strategic importance to States; a similarity which might well prove more significant in the formulation of legal rules; moreover, the current draft articles on aquifers covered both recharging aquifers and non-recharging aquifers, and the latter were, like oil and gas, a non-renewable resource; and(c) while the environmental concerns associated with the resources called for different rules, such rules did not necessarily require a different legal framework.
Several delegations had worked on that proposal with the aim of conveying the same message as that contained in the current draft article but using clearer language.
This is perfectly true, but the current draft article 17, which mentions specific grounds that are particularly relevant in the context of the effects of armed conflicts, perhaps makes the purpose of the draft article clearer than a general and abstract reference would.
There can be no doubt that the current draft article 2, subparagraph(b), does not provide for any exclusions in this regard and, therefore, should apply to all armed conflicts, even though the draft article itself and the commentary are silent on this point.
However, it was noted that the current draft article stating the principle of non-discrimination was formulated on the basis of existing UNCITRAL provisions that had received numerous enactments, and that the interpretation and application of such rule had not posed any particular issue.
The current draft article 15 contains a drafting error:
His delegation supported the general concept behind draft article 28, on international responsibility in case of provision of competence to an international organization-- States should not be allowed to evade their international obligations by transferring competence to an international organization-- but the concept needed more clarification than the current draft article provided.
According to article 1, paragraph 2, of the current draft articles.
It is clearly preferable to follow the same approach in the current draft articles.
A differentiation in this respect of the current draft articles from the articles on State responsibility would be unwarranted.
Nevertheless, article 32 had been found undesirable by several members of the Commission within the scope of the current draft articles.
The current draft articles do not identify the mechanism for their enforcement nor the entities that would be responsible for their interpretation.
Following a detailed discussion, it had been decided that, for the purposes of the current draft articles," high-ranking officials" should not enjoy immunity ratione personae.