Examples of using To conditional interpretative declarations in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In view of the nature of conditional interpretative declarations, which makes them quite close to reservations, the Special Rapporteur considered that the rules embodied in draft guidelines 2.3.1 to 2.3.3 in respect of reservations might be transposed to conditional interpretative declarations.
It is less difficult to identify a broad trend in the positions taken by speakers in the Sixth Committee regarding the advisability of including in the Guide to Practice guidelines concerning the juridical regime applicable to conditional interpretative declarations.
However, the guideline appeared in brackets for the time being, pending a decision by the Commission as to the treatment to be given to conditional interpretative declarations in the Guide to Practice.
Regarding draft guideline 2.9.10 concerning reactions to conditional interpretative declarations, She agreed with the provisional nature of the wording, because it was premature to rule on whether that type of declaration, from the point a view of its legal nature, constituted an interpretative declaration or a reservation.
With respect to conditional interpretative declarations, there is hardly any prima facie reason to depart from the rules of form and procedure applicable to the formulation of reservations; by definition, the State or international organization formulating such declarations subjects its consent
In this report, the Special Rapporteur will therefore continue to raise questions about the rules applicable to conditional interpretative declarations and will propose that the Commission take a decision on the matter only after consideration of the report which he will prepare on the permissibility of reservations and interpretative declarations and their legal effects.
With regard to conditional interpretative declarations, it was pointed out that they were nothing more than a particular category of reservations. The Special Rapporteur had adopted the right approach in deciding
He wondered, therefore, whether it would not be best to amend draft guideline 2.4.1 so that it applied only to conditional interpretative declarations, and to include in the draft article a guideline identical to draft guideline 2.1.5, except that it would apply only to conditional interpretative declarations.
Further, with regard to conditional interpretative declarations, which already have been the subject of considerable debate, we note that guidelines 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 address this issue by placing the entire issue of conditional interpretative declarations under the legal regime of reservations.
The last two paragraphs of draft guideline 2.4.7 are, consequently, modelled on the text of draft guideline 2.1.5, although the Commission has not considered it necessary to reproduce in detail the provisions of draft guidelines 2.1.6 to 2.1.8, the elements of which are, however, transposable mutatis mutandis to conditional interpretative declarations.
If, mutatis mutandis, an identical regime applies to both, there would still be time to delete specific guidelines relating to conditional interpretative declarations and adopt a single guideline assimilating the legal regime applicable to conditional interpretative declarations to that of reservations.
With regard to draft guideline 2.9.10 on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations, members voiced doubts about the relevance of such a distinction, given that, according to a majority of Commission members, the legal regime of conditional interpretative declarations was indistinguishable from that of reservations.
In accordance with the position outlined in the seventh report, it is very likely that there is no need for the legal regime applying to conditional interpretative declarations to differ from the regime applying to reservations; nevertheless, the Commission will take a final position in this regard only after deciding on the issues relating to the permissibility of reservations and interpretative declarations and their effects.
According to another point of view, the draft guidelines should distinguish clearly between simple and conditional interpretative declarations, stating explicitly in each relevant guideline whether both types were covered or only one.(For example, draft guideline 1.3.1 would apply only to conditional interpretative declarations, while draft guidelines 1.3.2, 1.5.3 and 1.7.2 should apply to both categories.).
Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
Draft guideline 2.9.10(Reactions to conditional interpretative declarations).
The situation is different with regard to conditional interpretative declarations.
This draft guideline must exclude special rules relating to conditional interpretative declarations.
She was in favour of deleting draft guideline 2.9.10 on reactions to conditional interpretative declarations.
His delegation wondered, moreover, whether draft guideline 2.1.8 should not apply, mutatis mutandis, to conditional interpretative declarations.