Examples of using Transparency in the field in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
By providing universal and non-discriminatory practical means to increase openness and transparency in the field of armaments, the Register constitutes a key element in efforts to reduce mistrust and miscalculation in the security environment.
arms effected at the global level, and has therefore made it possible to increase transparency in the field of security.
They affirm that they are prepared to continue and deepen such exchanges, since they not only enhance trust and mutual understanding in the bilateral relationship, but also advance the positive process of improving confidence-building measures and securing transparency in the field of Asia-Pacific security.
ensure that the Code is effective in enhancing transparency in the field of ballistic missiles.
that efforts in the field of conventional arms should be made separately from those aimed at increased transparency in the field of weapons of mass destruction.
Furthermore, my delegation believes that transparency in the field of armaments should facilitate transfers of military technology for peaceful purposes to the common good; at the same time it is desirable for the resources released by the reduction of military expenditure to be used for development projects for the benefit of our peoples.
Proceeding from this, we abstained from voting on the draft resolution relating to transparency as it did not include the positive measures that would reflect in actual practice the desired purpose of transparency in the field of all categories of armaments, especially with regard to the weapons of mass destruction.
Operative paragraph 3 of resolution 52/38 B requests the Secretary-General to seek the views of Member States on ways and means of enhancing transparency in the fields of weapons of mass destruction and transfers of equipment and technologies directly related to the development and manufacture of such weapons with a view to enhancing transparency in the field of conventional weapons.
Transparency in the field of the control and reduction of conventional arms provides a good basis for preventing an excessive concentration of weapons in any State. Kazakhstan supports the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, has provided information on a regular basis since 1992, and considers the Register to be the most important component of such control.
Therefore, we are involved in an annual exercise, both here in New York in groups of governmental experts, and in Geneva in an ad hoc committee on the matter, of speaking of the subject without making progress on something that we think should be included- transparency in the field of weapons of mass destruction.
need further consideration: the work of the Conference on Disarmament related to the United Nations Register for Conventional Arms; the transparency in the field of weapons of mass destruction; and the relation between regional and global in terms of TIA.
6 of draft resolution A/C.1/57/L.37 in order to convey our readiness for dialogue, our encouragement of all initiatives designed to strengthen transparency in the field of armaments, and our readiness to take part in such efforts.
took note of the message of the Secretary-General that the Register is an important tool in the work of increased openness and transparency in the field of armaments.
Some delegations held that the Ad Hoc Committee could proceed to the elaboration of concrete and specific confidence-building measures on openness and transparency in the field of armaments which would be universal and of a politically binding nature and which could be then implemented on global and regional levels.
General Assembly resolution 46/36 L of 9 December 1991, the first resolution on the issue of transparency in armaments, affirmed that transparency in the field of armaments could reduce the occurrence of dangerous misperceptions about the intentions of States and thereby enhance trust and confidence among them.
Article 1(2) served the purpose of clarifying that, where the rules on transparency provided for the exercise of discretion by the arbitral tribunal, that discretion should be exercised by the arbitral tribunal taking into account both the legitimate public interest in transparency in the field of treaty-based investor-State arbitration and in the arbitral proceedings as well the arbitrating parties ' own legitimate interest in an efficient resolution of their dispute.