Examples of using Second plea in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
In particular, it is not necessary to examine the second plea, in which the applicants allege that the statement of reasons for the contested decision regarding logistical
The Court considers that it is appropriate to examine at the outset the second plea since the applicant claims that the principle of equal treatment as between tenderers was infringed from the beginning of the tendering procedure.
By its second plea, Salzgitter accused the Commission of having committed an error in the interpretation of Article 4(c)
By his second plea, Mr Progoulis complains that the Court of First Instance failed to give an adequate statement of the reasons for which the judgment in Alexopoulou did not constitute a material new fact in his particular case.
the Court limited its analysis to the second plea in the action before it, which alleged that the Commission wrongly refused to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC.
both in the first plea as well as in respect of certain parts of the second plea, on the Commission's breach of its obligation to undertake a diligent
By its second plea, Hoechst claims that there has been a breach of its right to be heard in respect of the objection relating to its role as a leader of the cartel,
in paragraph 118 of the judgment under appeal, it rejected the second plea.
By its second plea, the Kingdom of the Netherlands claims that the contested decision infringes Article 221 of the Customs Code by declaring the application for remission time-barred
By the first part of the second plea, the German Government criticises the Commission for stating reasons for the contested decision only with respect to Article 92(3)(c)
As regards, next, the first part of the second plea, namely failure to take account of the probative value of the evidence submitted by the applicant,
By its second plea, L& D submits that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 by taking as its basis evidence which concerned not mark No 91 991
The first and second pleas.
It follows that the first and second pleas and the two pleas raised at the hearing must be dismissed.
It is appropriate to begin by considering together the first and second pleas and the two pleas raised at the hearing which are basically that the Commission failed to fulfil its obligations as regards treatment of the complaint.
My second plea concerns Afghanistan.
The second part of the second plea.
For all of those reasons, the second plea must be upheld.
The Commission rejects the various arguments put forward by the applicant in its second plea.
The second part of the second plea, relating to the failure to make available to all prospective tenderers various relevant technical information from the beginning of the tendering procedure.