Examples of using Second plea in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
The second plea is based on an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.
The second plea in the main appeals, the crossappeals
Second plea: infringement of the rights of the defence
The second part of the second plea, relating to the failure to make available to all prospective tenderers various relevant technical information from the beginning of the tendering procedure.
The second plea in law is divided into two branches,
down in Article 7(1)(b) of that regulation on the basis of which, however, the Court of First Instance rejected the second plea, raised at first instance, against the contested decision.
Finally, the Court of First Instance also rejected the second part of the second plea, based on the lack of any real risk of loss for the EAGGF- a further condition for the imposition of a financial correction under the Guidelines-
the judgment under appeal, it rejected the second plea.
The second plea is based on Article 249 EC
the Court limited its analysis to the second plea in the action before it, which alleged that the Commission wrongly refused to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC.
several liability to Akzo Nobel, first, the fact remains that the applicants did not base their second plea on such an error.
Consequently, the second plea in law must be rejected as in part irrelevant,
Second plea raised by BASF:
first, that, insofar as the Board of Appeal, in the contested decision, merely upheld the refusal of the Opposition Division to extend the period specified for submission of proof of use of the earlier marks, the second plea must be examined in the light of the statement of reasons on which the Opposition Division's refusal was based.
the first part of the second plea, whereby the applicant claimed that the condition that there must have been a significant failure to apply the Community rules, within the meaning of the Guidelines, was not fulfilled in this case.
As regards the third part of the second plea, relating to a raft of claims in respect of failings attributable to the European Commission,
the first part of the second plea, the Court of First Instance found,
there is no need to examine the second plea in the main appeals,
The Commission contends that the second plea in law should be rejected on the ground that the contested letters contain a sufficient statement of the reasons on which they are based,
On the second plea in law, the Court of First Instance first of all referred to settled caselaw,