Examples of using Present judgment in English and their translations into Italian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
Accordingly, the temporal effects of the present judgment should not be limited.
The request that the effects of the present judgment should be limited in time.
It is therefore not appropriate to limit the temporal effects of the present judgment.
Various aspects of that legislation are relevant for the purposes of the present judgment.
It is therefore not appropriate to limit the temporal effects of the present judgment.
Accordingly, there is no need to limit the temporal effects of the present judgment.
It is not bound by the directives referred to in paragraph 11 of the present judgment.
the Court answers that there is no need to limit the temporal effects of the present judgment.
The financial penalties imposed by the present judgment must be paid to the Commission, into the‘European Union own resources' account.
the Court may place a temporal limit on the effects of the present judgment.
That circumstance is irrelevant in the light of the criteria resulting from the caselaw referred to in paragraphs 36 and 37 of the present judgment.
Nevertheless, as is apparent from paragraph 49 of the present judgment, the question posed by the referring court at the same time relates to Directives 2004/17 and 2004/18.
Third, as is apparent from paragraph 19 of the present judgment, that declaration appears to have been made by the appellants in the main proceedings without prejudice to any of their rights.
That circumstance is irrelevant in the light of the criteria resulting from the caselaw referred to in paragraphs 43 and 44 of the present judgment see also,
The Generalitat de Catalunya and the Spanish Government requested that the Court limit the temporal effects of the present judgment in the event that it should find the IVMDH to be contrary to EU law.
As has been noted in paragraph 13 of the present judgment, there is no agreement between the Kingdom of Belgium
as set out in paragraph 4 of the present judgment, does in fact disclose in a clear
The German Government argues that the third condition referred to in paragraph 52 of the present judgment- that the taxable person must be the‘holder of the shares'- is not fulfilled in the case before the referring court.
According to settled caselaw, the aim of that directive- which, as can be seen from paragraphs 5 and 24 of the present judgment, is applicable in the main proceedings- is to eliminate, through the introduction of a common system of taxation, any.
However, while the restriction found in paragraph 33 of the present judgment is capable of being justified by objective considerations of public interest such as those mentioned in the previous paragraph,