Приклади вживання Gave the film Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a rating of 1% based on 120 reviews,the Dark may not work as a thriller, but it's good for some head-slapping, incredulous laughter."[7] At Metacritic, it has a score of 9/100, indicating"overwhelming dislike".">
Scott Brown of Entertainment Weekly gave the film an F grade,the film's only positive review cataloged by Rotten Tomatoes, Michelle Alexandria of Eclipse Magazine wrote,"Alone in the Dark isn't going to set the world on fire, but it largely succeeds with what it has to work with.">
collapsing in a clatter of blockheaded manhunter-movie cliches."[13] Tirdad Derakhshani of The Philadelphia Inquirer gave the film two out of four stars, saying"There's not much here:
Metacritic gave the film a weighted average score of 51 out of 100,
Caroline Framke of The A.V. Club gave the film an'A', stating the"over-hyped sequel has zero business being this much fun".[17].
the film has a weighted average score of 69 out of 100, based on 25 critics,">indicating"generally favorable reviews".[15] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film a rare average grade of"A+",
the film has a weighted average score of 68 out of 100 based on 34 critics,">indicating"generally favorable reviews".[19] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film a rare grade of"A+".[3].
As of September 7, 2013, the review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported that 94% of critics gave the film positive reviews,the human psyche amid haunting landscapes."[11] Metacritic reported the film had an average score of 80 out of 100, based on 25 reviews.[12] On January 22, 2009, it was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature.">
indicating"generally unfavorable reviews".[16] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of"B+" on an A+ to F scale,
the film has a weighted average score of 31 out of 100, based on 16 critics, indicating"generally unfavorable reviews".[13]">Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of"C+" on an A+ to F scale, while those at PostTrak gave it 3 out of 5 stars.[3].
Metacritic gives the film an average score of 47%, based on 32 reviews.
Critic Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian gives the film a score of 3 out of 5.
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a rating of 41% based on reviews from 31 critics.
Peter Bradshaw at the Guardian gives the film five stars.
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 88% based on reviews from 8 critics, with an average rating of 6.8 out of 10.[11].
Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that 92% of 12 film critics have given the film a positive review, with a rating average of 7 out of 10.[5].
which should give the film a hue of maturity,
Terrorists!,' and Temple Grandin's illustrative animated sequences run a little too close to A Beautiful Mind for my taste."Murray gives the film a grade A-, in part for Danes' success in portraying Grandin as a full-fledged personality instead of"a checklist of symptoms gleaned from a medical journal."[17].