Examples of using Revised version of the draft decision in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
One of the co-chairs of the contact group on technical assistance and financial resources subsequently introduced a conference room paper setting out a revised version of the draft decision set out in the note by the Secretariat on the Basel Convention regional and coordinating centres(UNEP/CHW.11/5).
Following its discussion the Working Group agreed that the Secretariat, taking into account the comments made and in consultation with interested parties, would prepare a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/CHW/OEWG.8/2 for its consideration.
Subsequently the Conference of the Parties considered a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/FAO/RC/COP.6/10, to which the CAS numbers of the chemicals to be included in the listing had been added.
Following informal consultations in which a number of delegations expressed concerns with the wording of the draft decision, the representative of the European Community presented a revised version of the draft decision.
Subsequently, the Conference of the Parties adopted a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/CHW.11/8 prepared by the contact group, subject to confirmation from the contact group on synergies and budget matters that there were sufficient funds in the budget to implement it or that it would have no budgetary implications.
Following the informal consultations, the Conference of the Parties adopted a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/CHW.11/22, subject to confirmation from the contact group on synergies and budget matters that there were sufficient funds in the budget to implement it or that it would have no budgetary implications.
Subsequently, the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention adopted a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/FAO/RC/COP.6/15 prepared by the contact group, subject to confirmation from the contact group on synergies and budget matters that there were sufficient funds in the budget to implement it or that it would have no budgetary implications.
valuable information on the issue had been provided by the European Community, and consequently a revised version of the draft decision had been prepared by Chile, Colombia and Uruguay and circulated as a conference room paper.
Subsequently, the Conference of the Parties considered a conference room paper prepared by the contact group setting out a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/FAO/RC/COP.6/8, which contained an amended table showing the listing to appear in Annex III to the Convention.
Subsequently, the representative of the United States reported that, despite a range of views among participants and concerns over some parts of the text, the group had reached consensus on a revised version of the draft decision, contained in a conference room paper.
Subsequently, the chair of the drafting group presented a conference room paper containing a revised version of the draft decision.
At its 8th meeting the Committee approved a revised version of the draft decision on oceans for consideration and possible adoption by the Governing Council.
At its 10th meeting the Committee approved a revised version of the draft decision on the green economy for consideration
Following those discussions the Working Group agreed to forward a revised version of the draft decision, as set out in annex I to the present report, to the Twenty-Sixth Meeting of the Parties for further consideration.
Subsequently, the representative of China introduced a revised version of the draft decision on essential-use nominations for controlled substances for 2012, noting that the essential-use authorization for 2012
Subsequently, a representative speaking on behalf of a group of countries reported that the small group of parties had reached an agreement on the text of a revised version of the draft decision set out in document UNEP/CHW.11/17.