Voorbeelden van het gebruik van Applicant argues in het Engels en hun vertalingen in het Nederlands
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Programming
The Applicant argues that the discussion that took place on 7 March 2011 between her,
In this connection the applicant argues that the museum's board of trustees would have known as early as 1939 that the collection would leave the museum the following year, that'Jews are involved here',
In part B of the explanation, which concerns the criterion described above in point I under b, the applicant argues that during the procedure relating to RC 1.6 there were serious procedural errors,
In its reply, the applicant argues that there is a new element in the defence,
In addition, the applicant argues that, if the objective actually pursued was to transform the intervention system,
In the first part of this plea, the applicant argues that the Commission was wrong to conclude, in points 15, 65 and 66 of the contested decision,
In response to the questions related to toxicity, the applicant argues that due to the pharmacologic effect of ephedrine
The applicant argues that the contested decision contravenes the principle of restrictive interpretation as developed by the caselaw of the Court of Justice in relation to the interpretation of Article 36 of the EC Treaty(now,
In its reply, the applicant argues that to avoid arbitrariness the best yardstick for assessing the legality of the latitude to determine fines which the Commission enjoys under the relevant rules is previous practice
of Article 4 of Regulation No 99/63, the applicant argues that it did not occupy a joint dominant position together with SDL.
In this connection the applicant argues that the museum's board of trustees would have known as early as 1939 that the collection would leave the following year,
Finally, the applicant argues that the interpretation of Article 8(4)
Similarly, whilst the applicant argues that surplus production in other Member States could be exported to Ireland(also point 95),
In so far as the Applicant argues that there is unjustly no summary in either the revised version of the draft report of 11 July 2011
The applicants argue that these works were sold under Verwalter Kalb's management.
Based on this, the applicant argued that the horse should be classed as“ minor use/ minor species”
could he be equated with such a group as the applicant argued.
The applicants argued first of all that the Commission did not have thepower to establish infringements of the Treaty by means of decisions under Article 903.
The applicants argued that this provision was contrary to Article 5 of the Council Decision organizing elections to the European Parliament. ment.
The applicant argued that production and production capacity of fluorspar in the PRC have substantially increased in the period considered, reaching levels well above annual world consumption.