Приклади вживання The court finds Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Finally, the Court finds that the applicant was not obliged to introduce judicial proceedings under section 8 of the Land Ownership Act,
In these circumstances, the Court finds that the effect of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice was to deprive the applicant of his possessions within the meaning of the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
In the instant case, the Court finds that the subject matter of the litigation was not especially difficult,
Overall, therefore, the Court finds that the application to the applicant of the relevant provisions of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 was confined within reasonable limits given the importance of what was at stake
The Court finds reliable the applicant's
If the Court finds that a national central bank has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties, that bank shall
In the instant case, the Court finds that the subject matter of the litigation was not especially difficult,
in smaller size if the court finds possible it.
Overall, therefore, the Court finds that the application to the applicant of the relevant provisions of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 was confined within reasonable limits given the importance of what was at stake
If the court finds that the company was indeed making a profit,
It specifies that if the court finds that a law or another regulation is not compliant with the Constitution,
In the present case, the Court finds on the evidence that the applicant complained to the prison administration about certain aspects of his detention, in particular visits from relatives
Although it cannot be excluded that one of the reasons which affected this decision was the extensive use made by the prosecution of the interviews, the Court finds it unnecessary to speculate on the reasons why the applicant chose to give evidence at his trial.
In light of the above, the Court finds that the system of partial exemption was capable of subjecting the parents concerned to a heavy burden with a risk of undue exposure of their private life
The Court finds that this remedy affords an individual aggrieved by a court decision adopted after that date a real opportunity to have that decision annulled if the conditions prescribed by the Law of 21 June 2001 on the Introduction of Changes to the Code of Civil Procedure are satisfied(see relevant domestic law above).
Accordingly, the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6§ 1 of the Convention
Although the applicant was not in custody, the Court finds that the trial court should have fixed a tighter hearing schedule in order to speed up the proceedings(cf. Čevizović v. Germany, no. 49746/99, 29 July 2004,§§ 51 and 60).
The Court finds that, for the applicant, the possibility of instituting proceedings in the Federal Republic of Germany to challenge the validity
As to Hasan Merthoca's complaint, the Court finds that the deprivation complained of is the consequence of the applicant's expulsion and, therefore, does not require to be examined