Examples of using Parallel proceedings in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
Whereby the court second seised must stay proceedings until the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established so as to avoid parallel proceedings in different Member States and contradictory rulings, has given rise to questions of interpretation32.
With regard to setting supranational rules to ensure the effectiveness of choice of court agreements signed by the parties concerned in the event of parallel proceedings taking place,
In this respect, it is confirmed that no parallel proceeding could be initiated against Poland
This amendment aims at avoiding parallel proceedings in- and outside the EU.
To prevent parallel proceedings and of the application of different substantive laws to the property of a married
This option would contribute to prevent in a very limited extent the occurrence of parallel proceedings and the application of different substantive laws.
The EESC stresses the importance of preventing parallel proceedings and the application of different substantive laws to the property of married or registered couples.
Where there are indications that parallel proceedings are pending before the courts in different Member States, the courts should be obliged to contact each other.
Available information clearly supports the view that these mechanisms have allowed the appropriate authority to handle cases while also avoiding unnecessary parallel proceedings and inconsistent enforcement efforts.
in particular in the event of parallel proceedings.
The principal reason cited by the President for granting the application was the existence of parallel proceedings before the Irish Supreme Court concerning Unilever's use of freezer exclusivity.
The Commission will support the Member States in their enforcement efforts against infringements with an important EU-level dimension, thereby avoiding the duplication involved in carrying out parallel proceedings to address the same infringements.
In fact, it is estimated that these mechanisms have allowed for the reduction of the number of proceedings to around 150 from almost a thousand potential parallel proceedings in the period between 2004 and 2008.
in the first place to ensure the smooth circulation of judgments in Europe and prevent parallel proceedings.
interaction between the courts seized in parallel proceedings and/or to exclude the application of the rule in the case of negative declaratory relief cf. supra, point 3.
Member State Central Authorities, the prevention of parallel proceedings and the free circulation of judgments,
exclusive jurisdiction of third State courts, or when parallel proceedings have already been brought in a third State5.
I wish to emphasise the importance of direct consultations between the authorities in European Union countries in order to do away with parallel proceedings and avoid situations where the relevant institutions in a particular state have to subjectively determine sentences for charges brought against citizens,
interaction between the courts seized in parallel proceedings and/or the exclusion of the application of the rule in the case of negative declaratory relief cfr. supra, point 3.
the information of the courts on parallel proceedings in another Member State,