Examples of using Asylum application in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
This is because the current EURODAC Regulation is not concerned with storing information on irregular migrants for longer than what it necessary to establish the first country of entry under the Dublin Regulation if an asylum application had been made in a second Member State.
new information is required to be updated in EURODAC relating to the Member State that becomes responsible for examining an asylum application following allocation of an applicant to another Member State.
The volume and concentration of arrivals has exposed in particular the weaknesses of the Dublin System, which establishes the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application based primarily on the first point of irregular entry.
EURODAC has proved to be a very important tool providing fingerprint comparison evidence to assist with determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application made in the EU.
temporary derogation from certain provisions of the Dublin Regulation, in particular as regards the criterion for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
temporary derogation from certain provisions of the Dublin Regulation, in particular as regards the criterion for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
degrading treatment when clarifying EU rules for determining which country should deal with an asylum application(MEMO/11/942).
In addition, Netherlands reported having carried out a GDISC pilot project in Cyprus which provided advice on the reception of asylum applicants and on the organisation of the asylum application procedure.
The response of states to the issue of child trafficking must not be determined by the immigration status of the child and their asylum application, but in the best interests of the child.
To determine the elements on which the asylum application is based which could not be obtained in the absence of detention, in particular if there is a risk of absconding.
agreeing on evidence proving a Member State's responsibility for examining the asylum application, leading therefore to an increase in the number of rejections of requests to accept the transfer of applicants.
Another ground for detention is to determine those elements on which their asylum application is based which could not be obtained in the absence of detention, in particular when there is a risk of absconding of the applicant.
determine elements on which the asylum application is based which could not be obtained without detention, especially if there is a risk of absconding;
The so-called"Dublin system" includes Council Regulation 343/2003 establishing the criteria for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, and Council Regulation 2725/2000 concerning the establishment of"Eurodac" for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention(subsequently, Regulation 343/2003).
That method of determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged by an unaccompanied minor having no member of his family present in the territory of a Member State is based on an objective criterion as stated in recital 4 in the preamble to Regulation No 343/2003.
6 of Directive 2013/32 by providing that an asylum application must be made in person before the competent asylum authority, and exclusively in the transit zones,
which makes it possible to determine the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application.
to examine an asylum application, to guarantee effective access to the procedures of determining refugee status,
This included, for example, acceleration of the asylum procedure in case of subsequent/serial asylum application, as well as the introduction of a reporting obligation for asylum applicants during the admission procedure if a negative decision is likely
mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national OJ 2003 L 50, p.