Examples of using Were compared in English and their translations into Norwegian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
10 mg dapagliflozin once daily were compared in healthy subjects.
Pistols were compared with the German"Walter" PP,
A competitor analysis has also been carried out, where Borregaard's products were compared to competing products with regard to greenhouse emissions from a life cycle perspective.
People who were given cranberry juice, capsules or tablets were compared with people given water,
Clinical outcomes were compared with those in an external control group derived from a retrospective review of medical records.
There were 14 studies in which two or more groups of girls and women with different types of FGM/C were compared with regards to the occurrence of one
In a reviews the results of twenty Goji creams or products were compared with Goji berries(e.g. capsules).
on metabolic syndrome were compared.
non-specific acupuncture were compared in a group of 900 patients.
We did not identify systematic reviews where drugs within the ARB class were directly compared. Neither did we find systematic reviews in which the combination drugs were compared.
the PSC patients recruited for this current study were compared to IBD controls as well as healthy controls(HC).
the microRNA profiles of stem cells differentiating to chondrocytes were compared to the profile of chondrocytes.
perfenazine and flupentixole were compared with second- generation antipsychotics.
the stiffness of oil between contact points on the camshaft were compared.
So in the study of BTi62, the tensile properties of 400 C at high temperature were compared with that of TC4 with the same specification.
combustible waste were compared.
In addition, OPA GMTs between subjects receiving Prevenar 13 with or without 2-PE were compared.
When these Galaxy Zoo classifications were compared with three previous smaller-scale attempts by professional astronomers,
Recommended treatments for heart attacks that had appeared in textbooks published over a period of 30 years were compared with evidence that could have been taken into account had the authors systematically reviewed the results of fair tests of treatment reported during that time.
When the results of the forensic examination were compared with the available data